Yeah, why bother? Quinn may not have much of a vision for the city or plans to improve the lot of the ever-expanding poor or the real middle class (not that $400,000-a-year-middle-class the Times aims at), "but neither has she made a long list of unrealistic promises," the Times says. She may be in the pocket of real estate interests, and may support Ray Kelly's scorched-earth policing policies, but what do we expect in a diminished city?
According to the NY Times, the era of getting things done that benefit all New Yorkers is over. Because it's just too hard.
Politics. Policy. Infrastructure. Transportation. 11231. Miscellania. Critters. Email: firstandcourt at gmail dot com
Tuesday, August 27, 2013
mcbrooklyn: The Difference Between Quinn and de Blasio, and Why the New York Times Is Out of Touch
McBrooklyn weighs in on the Times endorsements:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment