Glenn Greenwald On Impunity For America's Elites

Before the internet I would want to tear my hair out reading articles about obvious government abuses and crimes that went unpunished, and the blathering a of pundits who were  (and are) courtiers to the powerful.  

The internet was a revelation, because finally there was a way to talk about these things that were simply glossed over and ignored in the corporate press. I am very much looking forward to Glenn getting a bigger microphone.

TL;DR

"So, for the top national security official in the United States to go to the Senate and lie to their faces and deny that the NSA is doing exactly that which our reporting proved that the NSA was in fact doing is plainly a crime, and of course he should be prosecuted, and would be prosecuted if we lived under anything resembling the rule of law, where everybody is held and treated equally under the law, regardless of position or prestige. Of course, we don't have that kind of system, which is why no Wall Street executives have been prosecuted, no top-level Bush officials were prosecuted for torture or warrantless eavesdropping, and why James Clapper hasn't been prosecuted despite telling an overt lie to Congress. And what's even more amazing, though, Amy, is that not only has James Clapper not been prosecuted, he hasn't even lost his job. He's still the director of national intelligence many months after his lie was revealed, because there is no accountability for the top-level people in Washington. And the final thing to say about that is, there's all kinds of American journalists who love to go on television and accuse Edward Snowden of committing all these grave and horrible crimes. They're so brave when it comes to declaring Edward Snowden to be a criminal and calling for [inaudible]. Not one of them has ever gone on television and said, "James Clapper committed crimes, and he ought to be prosecuted." The question that you just asked journalistically is such an important and obvious one, yet not—none of the David Gregorys or Jeffrey Toobins or all these American journalists who fancy themselves as aggressive, tough reporters, would ever dare utter the idea that James Clapper ought to be arrested or prosecuted for the crimes that he committed, because they're there to serve those interests and not to challenge or be adversarial to them."

http://www.eschatonblog.com/2013/10/tldr.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2FbRuz+%28Eschaton%29

- - -
Shared from the Digg iPhone app
Want more stories like this? Check out Digg Reader →

Typos courtesy of my iPhone